Blogging Akymbo

A controversial bill that would require women to get an ultrasound before an abortion is now in doubt after Virginia Gov. Robert F. McDonnell diluted the measure Wednesday by making it optional in many cases.

The legislation initially sought to require ultrasounds, which early last week prompted opponents to raise concerns over the procedures’ potentially invasive nature. In many cases, the ultrasounds would require a vaginal probe to establish gestational age.

On Wednesday, citing concerns over that intrusiveness, McDonnell (R), an abortion opponent who had repeatedly said he would sign the bill, asked state lawmakers to amend the measure. House members approved the governor’s amendments, but the bill’s Republican sponsor in the Senate said she would try to pull the measure for the session.

“Mandating an invasive procedure in order to give informed consent is not a proper role for the state,” McDonnell said in a statement. “No person should be directed to undergo an invasive procedure by the state, without their consent, as a precondition to another medical procedure.” He did not comment further.

Confusion over the legislation and ultrasounds — and considerable national media attention — preceded the unraveling of the bill. The original measure stated, simply, that a woman needed an ultrasound before an abortion. Many lawmakers did not understand that at the young fetal age abortions usually occur, the invasive vaginal ultrasound would be needed to establish gestational age, as required by the bill.

The Washington Post, “McDonnell, Virginia Republicans Back Off Invasive Vaginal Ultrasounds” (via inothernews)

What I don’t get about Republicans & the abortion/birth control “debate”: How can you be a member of the party that doesn’t believe in big government and support any bill that allows the government to play such an invasive role in a woman’s personal life and a doctor’s professional one?

Can we please just officially separate off “Religious Conservative” into its own political party? (Though, that is a bit of an oxymoron considering the separation of Church and State, but whatever…)

  1. adefectiveidealist reblogged this from inothernews
  2. tinyfloralninja reblogged this from inothernews
  3. wouldbeamiracle reblogged this from inothernews
  4. therealtallboy reblogged this from inothernews
  5. cointel-pro reblogged this from inothernews
  6. captaingwenspeaking reblogged this from itsadreamwithinadreamorisit
  7. itsadreamwithinadreamorisit reblogged this from inothernews
  8. randomactsofchaos reblogged this from inothernews
  9. soniarumzi said: Wow! All I have to say.
  10. americangardenia reblogged this from inothernews
  11. cephalopodqueen reblogged this from inothernews
  12. lioncubmeetslehdinosaur reblogged this from inothernews
  13. bloggingakymbo reblogged this from inothernews and added:
    What I don’t get about...& the abortion/birth control “debate”: How can you be a member of...
  14. stillhidden reblogged this from inothernews and added:
    “Many lawmakers did not understand that at the young fetal age abortions usually occur, the invasive vaginal ultrasound...
  15. nomoretexasgovernorsforpresident reblogged this from inothernews
  16. mimorena reblogged this from inothernews
  17. saarahsaaywhaat reblogged this from inothernews
  18. hairtrending reblogged this from inothernews
  19. per-mare-per-terram reblogged this from inothernews
  20. inothernews posted this